Legal Opinion

State v. Quaale

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2014No. 89666-6PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.

¶1 The arresting trooper in this DUI (driving under the influence) trial testified that he had “no doubt” that the defendant was impaired based solely on a *194horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test. We hold that the testimony was an improper opinion on guilt and affirm the Court of Appeals.

FACTS

¶2 Washington State Patrol Trooper Chris Stone saw a truck, driven by Ryan Quaale, speed by in a 25-mile-per-hour zone on a residential street. Trooper Stone’s radar captured Quaale’s speed at 56 miles per hour. Trooper Stone activated the lights on his patrol car and attempted to pull the truck over. In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. MechamWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. City Of Seattle v. Jeffrey LevesqueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. State Of Washington v. Justin Nicholas JenningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State Of Washington v. Zachary Damien CravenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API