Legal Opinion

Dolsen v. Kearney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1921No. Docket No. 157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Perkins (Willis B.), J., presiding. Bill by Fred R. Dolsen, against Thomas D. Kearney, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Gideon P. Benton, deceased, Gideon C. Benton and others for the specific performance of a land contract. Defendants filed a cross-bill to have such contract reformed. From a decree for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

In 1919, Gideon P. Benton owned a farm of about 100 acres in Northville township, in *669Wayne county, bordering on the River Rouge. His son, Gideon Carmi Benton (hereafter called Carmi) one of the defendants, owned a farm in the section hdjoining. Mr. and Mrs.- Henry Ford were desirous of purchasing a part of Gideon’s farm for a water power site and the floodage incidental thereto. Jay C. Hudson as their representative took the matter up with the Benton family. Gideon at that time was mentally incompetent. His wife and children were opposed to selling a part of the farm. Negotiations were had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burns v. CaskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Labranche v. PerronMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Johnson v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Osterhout & Fox Lumber Co. v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Fitch v. VatterMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. GrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Aniba v. Burleson SanitariumMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API