Legal Opinion
Conlin v. Masecar
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Monroe. (Kinne, J.) Bill to reform a deed. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
Complainant filed his bill in the circuit court for the county of Monroe, in chancery, to correct a mistake in, and reform, a deed executed by him to defendant, dated May 21, 1879, conveying to her—
“All that certain piece of land situate in the city of Monroe, county of Monroe, and State of Michigan, known and described as Tjots Number Twenty-three and Twenty-four (23 and 24) of the Studiford Plat/ according to the recorded plat thereof, with the buildings thereon.”
The deed contained covenants of seisin and against incumbrances, and a warranty to defend against all lawful claims. The bill…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Scott v. GrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Conti v. FisherSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
- Labranche v. PerronMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Schoenfield v. VeenboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Coyne v. Simrall Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.