Peacock v. Tata Sons, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.:
The complaint is for libel. The plaintiffs are a corporation and two individuals in that corporation who claim to have been the organizers thereof. The libel consists in the publication of a letter by one R. D. Tata, who was the president of the defendant corporation, which letter inclosed an exhibit which seems to be a part of a report upon some mica mines, which was submitted to the defendant corporation. In other words, two individuals, who are alleged to have been of good reputation, and this corporation, are jointly suing to recover for libel by reason of this single…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. HillNew York Supreme Court · 1869
- Collier v. Postum Cereal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Constitution Publishing Co. v. WaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Child v. EmersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- S. L. & Co. v. BockAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sherlock v. ManwarenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Dilworth v. Yellow Taxi Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
- Hart v. E. P. Dutton & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1949
- Kelso v. CavanaghNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- Rockville Park Homes, Inc. v. BlumenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.