Legal Opinion

Sherlock v. Manwaren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1924PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crouch, J.:

The defendants are physicians. The action is to recover damages for negligence in their treatment of the plaintiff. The complaint alleges in substance that on April 13, 1921, the plaintiff injured his shoulder by a fall, and was tended on that day by defendant Manwaren, who negligently set the shoulder; that subsequently defendant Bowerman undertook to reset the same, but did so negligently, permitting the shoulder to remain out of place for more than five weeks; that on May 24, 1921, defendant Bowerman negligently pulled the shoulder and arm apart, and permitted the same to remain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The New-York and New Haven R.R. v. . Schuyler, Cross, C.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. O'Connor v. . Virginia Passenger Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Moore v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Mullins v. DuVallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. 137 East 66th Street, Inc. v. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Zenith Bathing Pavilion, Inc. v. Fair Oaks Steamship Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Catanese v. LipschitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Haines v. Bero Engineering Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Porter v. Lane Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. Newton v. Livingston County Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API