Legal Opinion

Child v. Emerson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Macomb. (Yance, J., presiding.) Case. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

McGrath, 0. J.

Plaintiffs are Imsband and wife. In November, 1891, they entered into an agreement in writing, the material portions of which are as follows:

“Whereas, said party.of the first part has this day purchased and established a certain milk and cream business at 804 Third avenue, Detroit, Michigan, hereafter to be known and styled the cEdgewood Jersey Milk Company:'’
“ She does, for the consideration hereinafter set forth, appoint, make, and constitute said Putnam H. Child her general agent and manager in said business, for the term of five years from and including this date, hereby…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. BascomSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bowen v. LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Graves v. American Acceptance Mortgage Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Inglis v. Public School Employees Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Hughes v. New England Newspaper Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Peacock v. Tata Sons, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API