Inglish v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The first question for consideration is whether pr not the Court of Appeals erred in refusing to sustain the motion of Maria Inglish to strike from the files the petition in error of the Industrial Commission.
The record shows that the defendant in the trial court, at the close of all the evidence in the case, made a motion for a directed verdict. This motion was overruled and exception noted.
Upon review in the Court of Appeals, it is unnecessary to have the record show that the motion for a new trial was made and overruled in the trial court, when the question presented is that there is no…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kyle v. Greene High SchoolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Stockley v. School District No. 1 of Portage Township.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Industrial Commission v. HenryOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Tarlecka v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Industrial Commission v. GintertOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Murphy v. Flint Bd. of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Lang v. Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- Claim of Hille v. Gerald RecordsNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.