Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Summerville
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 1, 1943No. 4-7031PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobins, J.
The appellee, George Summerville, a timber cutter employed by the appellant, Harry Hunter, received serious and disabling injuries in a wreck of the truck on which he was riding to his home from his work. He filed claim for compensation for his injuries with the workmen’s compensation commission. The claim was resisted by Hunter and his insurance carrier, who admitted that the appellee sustained the injury alleged' — a compound fracture of the right tibia — but denied liability on the ground that the injury did not arise out of or in the course of his employment.
The commission made a finding…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- McGregor & Pickett v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Elm Springs Canning Co. v. SullinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Triebsch v. Athletic Mining & Smelting CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Jensen v. Manning & Brown, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Harding Glass Co. v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.