Legal Opinion

Rose v. Elmer

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1946No. Civ. No. 13087PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the heirship of Wanda A. Rose and Wilma Auclair, daughters of a predeceased husband, in the estate of Annie T. Auclair who died intestate. Prom an agreed statement the following pertinent facts appear: George Auclair and Annie Petty (Auclair) were married on October 31, 1939; George Auclair died March 3, 1941; Annie Auclair died September 13, 1943. At the time of the marriage of George and Annie, George held title to certain real estate which was the separate property of George at the time of its acquisition. On November 29, 1940, George executed a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Estate of WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Jackson v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Estate of RattrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Estate of SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aubrey v. FolsomDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  2. Estate of LimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Estate of AuclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Estate of KreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Bassett v. ClevelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API