Legal Opinion

Estate of Auclair

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1946No. Civ. No. 13087PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

75 Cal.App.2d 189 (1946)

Estate of ANNIE T. AUCLAIR, Deceased. WANDA A. ROSE et. al., Appellants,

v.

HAZEL DEAN ELMER, as Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 13087.

California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One.

June 28, 1946.

Andrew P. Costelli and Girard N. Richardson for Appellants.

Phillips, Munck & Niemand for Respondents.

WARD, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the heirship of Wanda A. Rose and Wilma Auclair, daughters of a predeceased husband, in the estate of Annie T. Auclair who died intestate. From an agreed statement the following pertinent facts appear: George…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Estate of WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Jackson v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Estate of RattrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Estate of SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aubrey v. FolsomDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  2. Estate of LimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Estate of KreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Bassett v. ClevelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API