Legal Opinion

Estate of Watts

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1918No. Sac. No. 2813PublishedCited by 63 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Lon Bond, Deirup & Deirup, and Samuel J. Nunn, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Appeal from a decree of partial distribution. Lydia M. Watts, the decedent, was a widow. She left a large estate, all of which had been community property of herself and her predeceased husband, Nelson Watts. Nelson Watts had died intestate. The decedent, Lydia M. Watts, left a will. Its first paragraph directs the payment of funeral expenses and debts. The next reads as follows:

‘ ‘ Secondly, I hereby give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate wheresoever situate to my heirs and to be distributed to them according to law.”

The third and last paragraph appoints…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hochstein v. BerghauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. In Re Estate of MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. McConnell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API