Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Fischer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1930PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

At New York city, plaintiff and Bernard Dolinsky, both domiciled and resident in this State, intermarried. Always since that time she has remained domiciled and resident in New York. For the sole purpose of instituting an action for divorce against Dolinsky on grounds other than adultery, she went to Nevada. She intended, after the rendition of a decree, immediately to return here and consequently she never became a resident of that State. She temporarily lived there merely to give some appearance of colorable right to maintain her action. In her suit in the District Court at Reno based upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Atherton v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Olmsted v. OlmstedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Jones v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Bannon v. BannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Garvin v. GarvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Lefferts v. LeffertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Landsman v. LandsmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API