Legal Opinion
Rosenbaum v. Rosenbaum
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 1, 1955PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
This is an action solely for an injunction. It was brought by plaintiff to enjoin defendant, and all others acting on his behalf, from proceeding with the prosecution of an action for divorce commenced by him against plaintiff herein in the First Civil Court, Juarez, Mexico. The Supreme Court at Special Term denied plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction and, upon defendant’s motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, dismissed the complaint. The Appellate Division has reversed the orders of Special Term, and in granting leave to appeal has certified the following question: “…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Caldwell v. CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Gleason v. GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Bachman v. MejiasNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Lichtyger v. Franchard Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Spindel v. SpindelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Rosenstiel v. RosenstielNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.