Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. John E. Doherty & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1899PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill by Lyda Atkinson against John E. Doherty & Company, a corporation, to restrain the use for advertising purposes of the name and likeness of her deceased husband. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The late Col. John Atkinson.was a well-known lawyer and politician. After his death, the defendant, a manufacturer of cigars, brought out an article that it named the John Atkinson cigar, and sought to put it upon the market under a label bearing that name and a likeness of Col. John Atkinson. The widow of Col. Atkinson filed a bill to restrain this, and upon the hearing the circuit court made a decree dismissing the bill with costs, and the complainant has appealed.

As a rule, names are received at the hands of parents, —surnames by inheritance, and Christian names at their will. But this is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Folsom v. MarshU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
  3. Chapman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. Boston Diatite Co. v. Florence Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Schuyler v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Melvin v. ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API