Bowman v. Cockrill
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Leavenworth District Court. Ejectment, brought by defendant Cockrill, plaintiff below, against S. P. Bowman, Martin Nieman, and Elizabeth Nieman, plaintiffs in error, for the recovery of Lots No. 9 and 10, in Block No. 28, in Clark & Bees’ Addition to the city of Leavenworth. The action was commenced June 2, 1869. There was no controversy in this court about Lot No. 9, the disputed title relating to Lot No. 10 alone.
Read the full summary
Error from Leavenworth District Court. Ejectment, brought by defendant Cockrill, plaintiff below, against S. P. Bowman, Martin Nieman, and Elizabeth Nieman, plaintiffs in error, for the recovery of Lots No. 9 and 10, in Block No. 28, in Clark & Bees’ Addition to the city of Leavenworth. The action was commenced June 2, 1869. There was no controversy in this court about Lot No. 9, the disputed title relating to Lot No. 10 alone. Cockrill claims title to said Lot No. 10 under a Sheriff’s deed, and the plaintiffs in error claim title to said lot under a tax deed. The facts respecting Cockrill’s…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This -case has been ably argued by counsel on both sides. Probably no point has been overlooked, but every point which skill, ingenuity, perseverance and industry could discover has been hunted up and presented to us for our consideration.
*3241. smiufp's bbedj not tobe tetK'iy.ed °01" *323I. We have already decided, in the case of Paine v. *324Spratley, 5 Kas., 525, that the sheriff’s deed under which defendaut Cockrill claims, was valid, and sufficient to pass title. In that case, and with respect to the same judgment, writs of execution, and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- State ex rel. Weir v. County JudgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
- Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Knox v. ClevelandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- State v. SquiresSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Harding v. K.C. Wall Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- State v. MinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Pond Creek v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Division of Howard CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.