Legal Opinion
Philip Morris Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 1999No. D032070PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
—In this coordination proceeding, defendants Philip Morris Incorporated et al.1 seek extraordinary relief directing the superior court to set aside an order granting the motion for peremptory disqualification of the coordination trial judge filed by plaintiffs U.A. Local No. 467 Health and Welfare Trust Fund (Local No. 467) et al.2 (Code Civ. Proc.,3 § 170.6; Cal. *119Rules of Court,4 rule 1515.) Defendants contend the court should have concluded as a matter of law that those plaintiffs’ peremptory challenge to the coordination trial judge constituted an unlawful second…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McGhan Medical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- SCHOOL DIST. OF OKALOOSA CTY. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paterno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jane Doe 8015 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Sunrise Fin., LLC v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In Re Needles CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Prescription Opioid CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.