Legal Opinion

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1989No. H005533PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANNELL, J.

In this proceeding, we consider whether parties to an add-on petition in a coordination action are entitled to file a peremptory challenge to the coordination judge. We conclude that the Judicial Council rules governing coordination proceedings do not provide for such a right, that the Judicial Council had the authority to exclude parties to an add-on petition from the exercise of peremptory challenges, and that the exclusion is reasonable.

The coordination proceeding underlying the instant petition is In re Technical Equities Litigation which involves multiple actions by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Keenan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Home Ins. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. SCHOOL DIST. OF OKALOOSA CTY. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Paterno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Sunkyong Trading (H.K.) Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API