Legal Opinion
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1992No. A059008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOSSEE, J.
Petitioners, Farmers Insurance Exchange and Mid-Century Insurance Company (hereafter collectively referred to as Farmers), are the defendants below in actions filed by real parties which have been ordered coordinated under Code of Civil Procedure section 404.4. By timely petition for writ of mandate (§ 170.3, subd. (d); People v. Hull (1991) 1 Cal.4th 266 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 526, 820 P.2d 1036]), Farmers seeks to reverse denial of its section 170.6 challenge to the coordination judge.
We conclude that the challenge should have been accepted by reason of rule 1515 of the California…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Marriage of McKimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SCHOOL DIST. OF OKALOOSA CTY. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Paterno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Philip Morris Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Sunrise Fin., LLC v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Sunrise Financial, LLC v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019