Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Chesebrough-Pond's USA Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 18, 1996No. 3:92 CV 247 (GLG)PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Defendant Chesebrough-Pond’s USA Co. brings this motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, seeking judgment on all eight counts of plaintiffs’ complaint. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion (Document # 65) is granted.
BACKGROUND
In January 1990, plaintiff David Johnson (“Johnson”) was employed in Pennsylvania on a long-term assignment through a temporary agency. His employer appeared to have sufficient work to support his placement until the end of 1990, and there was a possibility of a permanent position. Johnson was…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Miner v. Town of CheshireDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Hernandez v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Hopkins v. New England Health Care Employees Welfare FundDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Scott v. Town of MonroeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Edwards v. Community Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.