Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. City of Hartford
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 14, 1997No. Civ. 3:95CV1517 (PCD)PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, Chief Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 56(e). The parties have submitted matters outside the pleadings, and thus the 12(b)(6) motion is converted into one for summary judgment. For the following reasons, summary judgment is denied on the grounds that there are genuine issues of material fact.
I. BACKGROUND
Alma Hernandez (“plaintiff’) is employed by the City of Hartford (“defendant”) as an Administrative Assistant in the Grants and Management Services Program of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Navarro Pomares v. Pfizer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Davoll v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Mark Bledsoe v. Palm Beach County Soil and Water Conservation District, Board of County Commissioners for Palm Beach CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Elwell v. Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.