Legal Opinion
People v. Danford
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 3, 1910No. Crim. No. 168PublishedCited by 12 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from orders denying a new trial and refusing to set aside the information. George R.' Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant was convicted upon an information charging him with willfully delivering to another a message falsely purporting to have been received by telegraph, knowing the same to be false, and with the intent to injure and deceive the one to whom it was delivered. The information was as follows:
“The said W. J. Danford is accused by the district attorney of and for the county of Los Angeles, state of California, by this information, of a felony .committed as follows: That the said W. J. Danford on the 23d day of December, 1909, at and in the county of Los Angeles, state of California, did…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Wooster v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- People v. NogiriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. BirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. DegnenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. CrossanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Pueblo v. Beltrán GómezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.