Legal Opinion

People v. Nogiri

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1904No. Crim. No. 997PublishedCited by 26 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los 'Angeles County. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The defendant was committed by a justice of the city of Los Angeles for the crime of an assault with a deadly weapon. Subsequently the district attorney filed his information against him, charging him with an assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder. Upon arraignment defendant moved to set aside the information upon the ground that prior to its filing he had not been legally committed by the magistrate for the offense charged against him.

The scanty record here presented fails to show the charge made against him in the complaint filed with the committing magistrate." The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. EbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. ChuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. People v. BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. BirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State v. McGreeveyIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Jones v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. Sacramento Butchers' Protective Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. People v. HelmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API