Legal Opinion

People v. Clement

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1894No. 21,031PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; J. W. McKinley, Judge. C. H. Clement was convicted of an attempt to commit grand larceny. Prom an order in arrest of judgment, the people appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

The people appeal from an order in arrest of judgment. The information contained two counts—the first, for the larceny of a horse, buggy, and harness, and the second count charging an embezzlement of the same property. The defendant demurred to the information upon the ground that it charged more than one offense. The demurrer was overruled and a plea of not guilty entered. After all the evidence had been introduced, and during the argument of the case to the jury, the district attorney, with the consent of the court and without objection from the defendant withdrew the count…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. De CourseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. QuviseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. State v. HurdWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. DanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Bohannan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Fidelity Savings Ass'n v. Bank of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API