Legal Opinion

People v. Crossan

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1927No. Docket No. 1492PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, J., pro tem.

Appellant was operating an aeroplane, and while it was in the air its engine stopped, making it necessary for him to land. He came down in the surf at Venice, and as he landed the aeroplane struck and killed two young girls who were in bathing. Thereupon an indictment was found against him in two counts, each of which charged the killing of one of the girls as manslaughter. At the trial he was convicted on both counts, and now appeals from the judgments and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Appellant complains that the court wrongly instructed the jury as to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. People v. RaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. State v. GonzalesIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API