Legal Opinion

People v. Sharp

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 2003No. C039242PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORRISON, J.

At issue in this case is whether a defendant convicted of cultivating marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11358) is eligible for drug treatment rather than incarceration under Proposition 36 (Pen. Code, § 1210 et seq.) if the cultivation was for personal use. We agree with the trial court that cultivation of marijuana does not meet the statutory definition of a “nonviolent drug possession offense” because it is not “possession, use, or transportation for personal use” or “being under the influence” of a controlled substance. (Pen. Code, § 1210, subd. (a).) Rather, cultivation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. CinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. LoveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. In Re OgeaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. People v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. People v. ParodiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. DescanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API