Legal Opinion

People v. Parodi

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 2011No. A130758PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DONDERO, J.

Pursuant to a negotiated bargain, defendant David W. Parodi entered a plea of no contest to willfully bringing a controlled substance into a jail facility in violation of Penal Code section 4573 (section 4573).1 He appeals the denial of his request for treatment under Proposition 36, contending the trial court erred in ruling his offense was ineligible for *1182such treatment. We conclude the crime of willfully bringing a controlled substance into a jail facility in violation of section 4573 does not meet the statutory definition of a “nonviolent drug possession offense” as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. People v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. People v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. People v. MonizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RaybonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  2. People v. RaybonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  3. People v. Wiley CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API