Legal Opinion

People v. Wheeler

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 2005No. C045860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, J.

Pursuant to a negotiated bargain, defendant Richard George Wheeler entered a plea of guilty to issuing or forging a prescription for a narcotic drug in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11368 (section 11368). He appeals the denial of his request for treatment under Proposition 36 (Pen. Code, § 1210 et seq.), contending the trial court erred in ruling his offense was ineligible for such treatment. We conclude forgery of a prescription in violation of section 11368 does not meet the statutory definition of a “nonviolent drug possession offense” as required for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re VarnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. JackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. EsparzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. People v. MonizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. People v. ParodiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. Gollardo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. People v. Bambino CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API