Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Kalak Water Company of New York, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
This is an action for an accounting of royalties allegedly due since May 1, 1950 under a written agreement dated February 13, 1915 between Kalak Water Company of California, a corporation, and W. W. Solliday and W. C. Sehalck. The plaintiffs, Montgomery and Johnson, are successors in interest to Kalak Water Company of California, and the defendant, Kalak Water Company of New York, was formed by and succeeded to the interests of Solliday and Schalck.
The complaint also seeks, because of the alleged defaults by the defendant, the transfer to plaintiffs of the trademark…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- President Suspender Co. v. MacwilliamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Rolley, Inc. v. YounghusbandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Replogle v. Air-Way Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Richard Royce Collection Ltd. v. New York City Shoes, Inc. (In Re New York City Shoes, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Wrist-Rocket Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. SaundersDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1974
- Haggar International Corp. v. United Co. for Food Industry Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Hendricks v. Knik Supply, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- TECNIMED SRL v. Kidz-Med, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.