Legal Opinion

Replogle v. Air-Way Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 5, 1923No. 1527PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

This is a trade-mark interference proceeding, in which the decision of the Patent Office was against Daniel B. *766Replogle and in favor of the Air-Way Company. The contest relates to the use of the name “Air-Way” on electric vacuum cleaners and parts thereof.

Replogle filed his application for registration of a composite mark, consisting of the words “Pneumode” and “Air-Way,” on November IS, 1918, alleging that he had commenced the use of the mark some time prior thereto. Just before the filing of his application Replogle was engaged in manufacturing and selling, under the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. President Suspender Co. v. MacwilliamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Ozone Co. v. United States Ozone Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  2. Ph. Schneider Brewing Co. v. Century Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Hanover Manufacturing Co. v. Ed Hanover Trailers, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Woodward v. White Satin Mills CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  5. Ludden v. Metro WeeklyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API