Legal Opinion
Rolley, Inc. v. Younghusband
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1953No. 13389PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant is appealing from a judgment of the District Court enjoining its use of the trade-mark “Voodoo” in connection, with perfumes, colognes and similar cosmetic products. The trial court found that appellees are the lawful owners of tlie trade-mark “Voodoo”; that appellees’ products bearing said trade-mark have been and are now extensively advertised and sold in interstate commerce so that such products are understood by the public to be appellees’ products; that appellant has used the trademark “Voodoo” without appellees’ 1 consent on and in connection with the sale…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Rokey v. Day & Zimmermann, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Barbasol Co. v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- McComb v. McCormackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Department of Water & Power of City of Los Angeles v. Okonite-Callender Cable Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Zazu Designs, a Partnership v. L'oreal, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Blue Bell, Inc. v. Farah Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Hydro-Dynamics, Inc. v. George Putnam & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.