Coe v. Young

I respectfully concur in judgment only as I part company with the majority as to the rationale employed in its reversal of the first assignment of error concerning the admissibility of testimony provided by appellant’s four expert witnesses. Nevertheless, as will be addressed later, I concur in the reversal because appellee’s objection to the expert witnesses wás untimely and, therefore, waived.

I will first address the majority’s determination that it was error for the trial court to exclude Dr. David Schneider’s testimony. In Miller v. Bike Athletic Co. (1998), 80 Ohio St.3d 607, 687 N.E.2d…