Miller v. Bike Athletic Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
In determining whether the trial court was warranted in granting appellees’ motions for summary judgment, we must consider whether the court properly excluded the scientific testimony of appellants’ expert witnesses.
I. Expert Testimony of Dr. Lafferty
At the core of this determination is whether the testimony of James Lafferty was admissible and whether the test he based his opinion upon was reliable.
Appellants retained James Lafferty, a consulting engineer in the areas of mechanical and biomedical engineering, to provide them with an opinion on whether the helmet…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- James H. Hinkle, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael Randle, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- State v. HartmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court · 2017
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.