Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 23, 2013No. A13-0515PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSON, Judge.
In 2004, Margaret Hunter borrowed money from Anchor Bank, N.A., to purchase a home for her adult son. The loan was secured by a mortgage on the son’s home and on Hunter’s home. Anchor Bank assigned the loan and mortgage to *12Emigrant Mortgage Company, Inc. In 2011, after the loan went into default, Emigrant Mortgage conducted a foreclosure by advertisement pursuant to section 580.05 of the Minnesota Statutes. But the homes encumbered by the mortgage were sold together, contrary to section 580.08, which requires that separate mortgaged parcels be sold separately at a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gregory Monson v. Jeff SuckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Fiecke-Stifter v. MidCountry BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- Joyce M. Woelfel v. U. S. Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Leeco, Inc. v. Cornerstone BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017