Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Following a bench trial in a quiet-title action, appellant argues that the district court erred when it ruled that service of the notice of foreclosure sale was properly effectuated under Minn.Stat. § 580.03. Because we conclude that the service requirements of the statute were satisfied, we affirm.
FACTS
In 2004, appellant Douglas Drews borrowed money from Key Mortgage Corporation to refinance a loan for the home where he had lived since 1984. He secured the loan with a mortgage on the property, which was ultimately assigned to Everhome Mortgage Company. After Drews…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Nielsen v. BralandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fiecke-Stifter v. MidCountry BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- Unifund CCR, LLC, as assignee of Pilot Receivables Management, LLC v. Jeffrey A. CarneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016