Legal Opinion

Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 2014No. A13-1135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Following a bench trial in a quiet-title action, appellant argues that the district court erred when it ruled that service of the notice of foreclosure sale was properly effectuated under Minn.Stat. § 580.03. Because we conclude that the service requirements of the statute were satisfied, we affirm.

FACTS

In 2004, appellant Douglas Drews borrowed money from Key Mortgage Corporation to refinance a loan for the home where he had lived since 1984. He secured the loan with a mortgage on the property, which was ultimately assigned to Everhome Mortgage Company. After Drews…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Nielsen v. BralandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fiecke-Stifter v. MidCountry BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
  2. Unifund CCR, LLC, as assignee of Pilot Receivables Management, LLC v. Jeffrey A. CarneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API