Leeco, Inc. v. Cornerstone Bank
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSON, Judge
A bank foreclosed on a mortgage on lakeshore property after the property owner failed to satisfy a guaranty on a line of credit. The mortgagor challenged the foreclosure sale on two grounds. First, the mortgagor argued that the lakeshore property should have been sold- as separate tracts in separate foreclosure sales because the property consists of multiple parcels for purposes of property taxes. Second,. the mortgagor argued that the bank’s notice of foreclosure sale misstated *656the amount due on the mortgage. The district court rejected both of the mortgagor’s arguments…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Business Bank v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Butterfield v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.