Legal Opinion

Leeco, Inc. v. Cornerstone Bank

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 2017No. A16-1875Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSON, Judge

A bank foreclosed on a mortgage on lakeshore property after the property owner failed to satisfy a guaranty on a line of credit. The mortgagor challenged the foreclosure sale on two grounds. First, the mortgagor argued that the lakeshore property should have been sold- as separate tracts in separate foreclosure sales because the property consists of multiple parcels for purposes of property taxes. Second,. the mortgagor argued that the bank’s notice of foreclosure sale misstated *656the amount due on the mortgage. The district court rejected both of the mortgagor’s arguments…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Business Bank v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Butterfield v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API