Legal Opinion
George E. Lloyd & Co. v. Matthews
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1906PublishedCited by 26 opinions
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers
Nelson E. Matthews and Clark H. Rice, banking partners, doing business at Ottawa, Ohio, brought an action of assumpsit against George E. Lloyd & Co., a corporation, on the endorsement and guaranty on the following promissory note:
“$1500.00 Ottawa, Ohio, July 25, 1902.
“Sixty days after date, we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of George E. Lloyd & Co. fifteen hundred dollars, payable at the banking house of Matthews & Rice, Ottawa, Ohio. Value received. If not paid at maturity to bear eight per cent interest from maturity.
Columbia Telephone Mane. Co. (Seal.)
By G. M. Risser, Prest.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atwater v. American Exchange Nat. BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- National Park Bank v. German-American Mutual Warehousing & Security Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Holm v. JamiesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Dobson v. MoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Schuttler v. PiattIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cotton States Belting & Supply Co. v. Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Grummet v. Fresno Glazed Cement Pipe Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Quigley v. W. N. MacQueen & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Vulcan Corp. v. Cobden Machine WorksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
- Cope-Swift Co. v. John Schlaff Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.