Legal Opinion

Mayhew v. Edward G. Budd Manfg. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 178, Calendar No. 36,263PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This ease, appealed by defendant corporation, must be reversed, the verdict for plaintiff being against the great weight of the evidence, and for another reason, which we discuss briefly, the reversal will be without new trial.

The action is on averred contracts of employment against defendant corporation and Budd, its president. In the trial court verdict in favor of Budd was directed, from which plaintiff has not appealed, so question of right to recover against Budd is foreclosed.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant corporation in 1924 at $25 per day, later changed to $700 per month, and he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ten Eyck v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cope-Swift Co. v. John Schlaff Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hallenbeck v. Powers & Walker Casket Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warszawa v. White Eagle Brewing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  2. Sadowski v. General Discount Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Faust v. Kent-Moore Organization, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Piggins v. FellingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hermann v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API