Legal Opinion
Otwell v. Bulduc
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 20, 2003No. AC 22845PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
In this personal injury action, the plaintiff, James Otwell, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants, Bruce Bulduc and William Bulduc. On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the court (1) improperly granted the defendants’ motion in limine to exclude certain evidence concerning Bruce Bulduc’s prior criminal history and (2) improperly denied the plaintiffs motion for a default. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*776In his complaint, the plaintiff alleged that on January 17, 1998, he was a passenger in a motor vehicle that…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. MorganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Kalas v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- U. B. Vehicle Leasing, Inc. v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Certo v. FinkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. GabrieleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Bligh v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015