Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 19, 2002No. AC 21086PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant, Jerry Rodriguez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2)1 and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 53-21 (2).2 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that the child victim was not competent to testify dining the trial and (2) ruled that the victim’s testimony given during a competency hearing was inadmissible evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MarsalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. State v. ConstantopolousConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. State v. McElveenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. In re Alejandro L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API