Legal Opinion

Certo v. Fink

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 19, 2013No. AC 33955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ESPINOSA, J.

The self-represented defendant James Fink1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, Paul V. Certo, Jr., and *742Carmen J. Barry, in connection with the underlying civil action in which the plaintiffs sought monetary damages and injunctive relief from the defendants. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) awarded more relief to the plaintiffs than was demanded in their amended complaint; (2) relied on the plaintiffs’ estimate of damages, in lieu of other evidence presented that would have provided a more accurate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re Alexander V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. Webster Bank v. ZakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. In re Alexander V.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Grasslands Plantation, Inc. v. Frizz-King Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HolleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Hospital Media Network, LLC v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. Purtill v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  4. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. GilbertConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API