Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Keeler
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings, conclusions and recommendation. Respondent’s repeated and serious disciplinary violations require, at a bare minimum, an indefinite suspension from the practice of law in Ohio. In fact, his conduct could ordinarily be expected to result in disbarment. See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Sprague (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 624, 660 N.E.2d 1168; Disciplinary Counsel v. Rubright (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 34, 630 N.E.2d 335.
However, we have given appropriate mitigating weight to respondent’s sincere efforts to overcome his alcoholism. See…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrathOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. SlatteryOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RubrightOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SpragueOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KnowltonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Miami County Bar Ass'n v. HallowsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. KnowltonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. KeelerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. HallowsOhio Supreme Court · 1997