Legal Opinion

Miami County Bar Ass'n v. Hallows

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1997No. 96-2429PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Public trust in the legal profession is tested daily in the service provided by each individual lawyer to his or her clients. When a lawyer, who has taken responsibility for a client’s papers or property, commingles client funds or dissipates that property, that lawyer not only ill serves the client but also contributes to the erosion of public trust in the profession. Columbus Bar Assn, v. Brooks (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 524, 664 N.E.2d 900.

This disciplinary proceeding involves a respondent whose clients expected him to promptly remit settlement funds and to handle estate funds with the utmost…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. SternerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnaughtonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. OstranderOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. MichaelsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KnowltonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KurtzOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. KnowltonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KurtzOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. NagornyOhio Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API