Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrath

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1994No. 94-1866PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree that respondent committed the disciplinary violations found by the board. While we agree with the two-year suspension and conditions recommended by the board, we stay only one year of said suspension, and thereafter place respondent on a one-year monitored probation. The conditions, as recommended by the board, shall apply during the full two-year suspension and probationary period. If respondent violates any of the conditions outlined by the board during the period of his probation, the two-year term of suspension will be automatically reimposed. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Akron Bar Ass'n v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. KeelerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. KeelerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrathOhio Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API