Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Slattery

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1996No. 95-841PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(6), 6-101(A)(3) and 9~102(A)(2), as well as Gov.Bar R. X. We also agree, in the main, with the board’s recommendation; however, we consider a two-year probation period more appropriate for the public’s protection. Moreover, consistent with relator’s suggested sanction, we are inclined to credit respondent for the purpose of his actual suspension period from December 16, 1994, the date on which he conscientiously entered the Prospect House and had already ceased practicing law on his own accord.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. KeelerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. KeelerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SlatteryOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API