Legal Opinion
Green v. Hemingway
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 7, 2003No. 02-2014PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Carl Green, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).
Green was convicted in 1990 of possession with intent to distribute more than five hundred grams of cocaine, conspiracy to distribute cocaine, and possession of a firearm by a prohibited person. He was sentenced to 420 months in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. PetermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Thomas John MaybeckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- In Re Carl Green, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Carl Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mark Hill v. Bart MastersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Chapman v. ADT LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
- Echevarria v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Green v. Hemingway, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003