Legal Opinion
United States v. Peterman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 30, 2001No. Nos. 99-3660, 99-3740, 99-3701, 99-3704PublishedCited by 363 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
Darrell Peterman, Craig Forest, and Robert Bell pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess and distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Peterman and Bell each filed an unsuccessful appeal and several collateral attacks challenging their sentences. Peterman, Bell, and Forest then filed the instant habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court granted the petitions, and defendants were resentenced to shorter terms. The government appeals, arguing that the district court did not have jurisdiction over the § 2241 petitions. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re Ocsulis DorsainvilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- In Re James Davenport and Sherman NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by363 opinions
- William Andrew Wright v. Stephen SpauldingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Jose Cardona v. B. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Benjamin Urbina v. Maryellen Thoms, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Mark Hill v. Bart MastersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Wooten v. CauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
358 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.