Legal Opinion

Mark Hill v. Bart Masters

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 7, 2016No. 15-5188PublishedCited by 223 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns a prisoner’s right to bring a successive habeas corpus petition under 28 U.SC. § 2241, challenging the misapplication of a sentence enhancement. Appellant Mark Hill contends that a career-offender enhancement was' erroneously applied to his sentence in light of subsequent caselaw establishing that his predicate offense was not a “crime of violence.” Because Hill is foreclosed from bringing a successive petition using 28 U.S.C. § 2255, he seeks to challenge his sentence under § 2241. The district court dismissed Hill’s petition. For the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by223 opinions

  1. United States v. Gerald WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. William Andrew Wright v. Stephen SpauldingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Jones v. HendrixSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  4. Jones v. HendrixSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  5. Stoney Lester v. J v. FlournoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018

218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API