Mark Hill v. Bart Masters
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.
This case concerns a prisoner’s right to bring a successive habeas corpus petition under 28 U.SC. § 2241, challenging the misapplication of a sentence enhancement. Appellant Mark Hill contends that a career-offender enhancement was' erroneously applied to his sentence in light of subsequent caselaw establishing that his predicate offense was not a “crime of violence.” Because Hill is foreclosed from bringing a successive petition using 28 U.S.C. § 2255, he seeks to challenge his sentence under § 2241. The district court dismissed Hill’s petition. For the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by223 opinions
- United States v. Gerald WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- William Andrew Wright v. Stephen SpauldingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Jones v. HendrixSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Jones v. HendrixSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Stoney Lester v. J v. FlournoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.