Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1900No. S.F. No. 2270PublishedCited by 12 opinions

PETITION" for mandamus from the Supreme Court to the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. J. K. Law, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

McFARLAND J.

This is an original petition here for a writ of mandamus to compel the superior court of the county of Stanislaus to take certain action prayed for in the petition. An alternative writ issued, and afterward a demurrer to the petition was interposed and the case was submitted on the demurrer.

The petition sets forth that on March 10, 1900, petitioner presented to said superior court, respondent herein, a written verified accusation in which it was alleged that one Baker, a director of the Modesto Irrigation District, had refused and neglected to perform his official duty as such…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Boyne v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
  4. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Huntington v. NicollNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  5. In re CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. De La Beckwith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Taliaferro v. LockeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Hilmer v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Ayers v. KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API