De La Beckwith v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Mandate to the Superior Court of Colusa County. H. M. Albery, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. L. Shinn, S. C. Denson, B. M. F. Soto, J. W. Dorsey, and Ernest "Wyand, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an application for a peremptory writ of mandate. There is no controversy as to the material facts, which are as follows, viz.:—
An action wherein this plaintiff was plaintiff, and various persons and corporations were defendants, was pending in the superior court of Colusa County, the object thereof being to have it determined that the plaintiff’s intestate was the owner of certain water locations and water-rights and rights of way, that whatever right, title, or interest was held by defendants therein was held by defendants in trust for plaintiff, and to require defendants to convey…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Richman v. Supervisors Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Lawrence v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- People v. EggersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Harth v. Ten EyckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.