Legal Opinion
Ayers v. Kingsbury
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 25, 1914No. Civ. No. 1368PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus, instituted in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco against the respondent in his official capacity as surveyor-general and ex-officio register of the state land-office. The petition for the writ was demurred to by the respondent upon the grounds that the facts stated did not constitute a cause of action, and that the proceeding was barred by the provisions of section 338, subdivision 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure. The demurrer was sustained, and the petitioners declining to amend, judgment was entered for the respondent, from which…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hutchings v. LowSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Shiver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gonzales v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pacific Power Co. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Casmalia School District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Hooper v. KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Parker v. KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Parker v. KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914